Jill essentially argued that church meetings have become unnecessarily predictable, formulaic and programmatic. She suggested that meeting have become too religious and can easily become a club or spectator sport, but the real measure of a community isn’t what you get out of it, but what you contribute. She drew our attention to her own personal experience of a home church she was part of, a flexible little community that was more about supporting one another and enjoying company than running a program.
You can’t have a church meeting/discussion night without a
good anagram, and luckily Jill provided one of her own, being WORD FRED to
describe the values she felt was important for when we meet together. It means:
Welcoming
Organic
RelevantDialogue
Friendly
Relaxed
Expression
Discussion
The point is to paint a picture rather than set to set out a
linear meeting that is clearly building towards an end, all meant to promote
participation and a strong sense of ownership among everyone there.
Jill’s final challenge was that church meetings should have
something to say about people’s vocations, their jobs, rather than seeing them
as a means to get by. She argued for a strong undercurrent of connectivity
between all of life instead of a sacred/secular divide that confuses many
people and leads to an impression that the ‘real’ work of the kingdom is found
within church programs.
A few groups did mention that this is particularly hard to
foster in a big community like ours and so we would have to get really
deliberate and creative with informal gatherings and places to enjoy community
with each other in different settings. There was also a concern that with too
much informality over meals we would need to make sure it didn’t descend into
the trivial and we need to remain intentional about discussions together.
WORD FRED doesn't mean that much without the pic of Fred Flintstone, which was my inspiration for this particularly profound set of thoughts. Can you do something about this please Sambo?
ReplyDelete